Showing posts with label Social Issues- Mains. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Issues- Mains. Show all posts

Thursday, January 23, 2014

POVERTY AND POVERTY ESTIMATION IN INDIA (SOCIAL ISSUE)


DEFINING POVERTY
  • Poverty, droughts, underdevelopment, different sorts of inequalities and domination have been the age old problems or phenomena observed from the past to the present and across the time and space. Poverty is a very vague concept with varied connotations and facets.
  • Traditional definition of poverty is constructed with one dimensional approach of income and food intake capabilities.
  • Social Scientists distinguish between ‘relative’ and ‘absolute’ poverty.
  • Relative poverty views poverty as socially defined and dependent on social context, hence relative poverty is a measure of income inequality. Usually, relative poverty is measured as the percentage of population with income less than some fixed proportion of median income.
  • Absolute poverty, extreme poverty, or abject poverty is “a condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services. Absolute poverty occurs when people fail to receive sufficient resources to support a minimum of physical health and efficiency, often expressed in terms of calories or nutritional levels.
  • The World Bank defines poverty as “the inability to attain a minimal standard of living”. The World Bank website on ‘Poverty Reduction and Equity’ defines poverty in comprehensive manner, saying, “Poverty is hunger. Poverty is lack of shelter. Poverty is being sick and not being able to see a doctor. Poverty is not having access to school and not knowing how to read. Poverty is not having a job, is fear for the future, living one day at a time. Poverty is losing a child to illness brought about by unclean water. Poverty is powerlessness, lack of representation and freedom.”
  •   UN definition of poverty: Fundamentally, poverty is a denial of choices and opportunities, a violation of human dignity. It means lack of basic capacity to participate effectively in society. It means not having enough to feed and clothe a family, not having a school or clinic to go to; not having the land on which to grow one’s food or a job to earn one’s living, not having access to credit. It means insecurity, powerlessness and exclusion of individuals, households and communities. It means susceptibility to violence, and it often implies living in marginal or fragile environments, without access to clean water or sanitation.
UNI-DIMENSIONAL VS. MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONCEPT OF  POVERTY
 Uni-dimensional idea of poverty
  • This traditional idea of poverty associates it with lack of sufficient money, so it tries to measure poverty in terms of shortage of income. It is a one-dimensional approach focused on income or lack of it.
  • Poverty researchers, in their efforts to quantify poverty, came up with the clearly tangible idea of headcounts of the poor so that some number can be attached with poverty. This gave birth to the concept of monetary poverty lines – people with income below the poverty line came to be labeled poor.
  • But, Human well-being is a complex issue and is affected by many factors – both material and non-material. In fact, people’s well being depends upon a plethora of factors that can be psychological, social, cultural, political and environmental. Any oversimplified measure can provide convenience but can’t ever present the complete picture. So, the one-dimensional poverty concept is inadequate.
Multidimensional concept of poverty
  • The modern multidimensional approach is characterised with a broader view and considers poverty as a deprivation of essential productive assets and opportunities to which every human being should be entitled. This approach believes that defining poverty in terms of consumption expenditure misses the point.  Assets and its distribution are the key factor. 
There are two approaches that define poverty as a state of multiple deprivations. One is the basic needs approach (BNA) which views poverty as “deprivation of consumption” and the other is the capability approach (CA) in which poverty is seen as “deprivation of opportunities.”
1. The Basic Needs Approach (BNA)
  • This approach aims to provide the opportunities for the full physical, mental and social development of people. Although it aims to provide conditions for comprehensive fulfillment of human life (material, social, cultural and political), in operational terms it primarily focuses on the minimum requirements for a decent life – health, nutrition and literacy – and the goods and services needed to realize it, such as shelter, sanitation, food, health services, safe water, primary education, housing and related infrastructures.
  •  This is the most popular idea behind state’s welfare programs which are designed so that people’s basic minimum needs (as prescribed) are met.
2.  Amartya Sen’s capability Approach                                                                          
  • Amartya Sen’s capability approach provides a more useful alternative to understand poverty.
  • Capability approach to understanding poverty goes beyond income and emphasizes the whole range of means, available to achieve human capabilities like literacy, longevity and access to income.
  • From this perspective, poverty is seen as the failure of some basic capabilities to function- a person lacking the opportunity to achieve some minimally accepted level of these functionings.
  • The functionings relevant to his analysis include
  1. Physical ones as being well nourished, being adequately clothed,   and sheltered
  2. Social achievements such as taking part in the life of the community, being able to appear in public without shame and so on;
  3. The opportunity of  converting personal incomes into capabilities to function depends on a variety of personal circumstances including age, gender, proneness to illness, disabilities and so on; and Social surroundings.

  • The notion of poverty thus goes beyond income and basic services. People who are under empowered, who are unable to participate in making the decisions, who are deprived of basic education, health care, nutrition, water and sanitation, employment and wages and who pass many different inabilities and adversities like inequality of asset, unequal distribution, ignorance, corruption, lack of political power, lack of political will,  natural calamities, inadequate governance, lack of opportunities of development, inappropriate public policies and programmes, lack  of access to entitlements and many hurdles in the well being of human beings are included in the category of poor.
  • There are many other social dimensions of poverty like caste, untouchability, bondages, gender discrimination, social exclusion, domination and violence against the downtrodden.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

Report abuse, now

        STORY of Keerthi :
  • The legislation provides for support to victims of domestic violence by providing for shelter homes, medical help, legal assistance and Keerthi, who earned more than husband Sridhar, was a victim of constant abuse, both emotional and physical, by her insecure husband and his mother.Things got worse when Keerthi got a promotion.Sridhar started landing up at her workplace and harassing her. One day, the physical abuse got so bad that fearing for her safety, Keerthi left the house with her daughter, and went to stay with a friend.. Next day, Sridhar landed up at her workplace, creating a scene. Her employer politely asked her to either resolve the issue or find another job. The child was also traumatised because Sridhar confronted her at school in front of her friends and teachers, blaming her for going away with her mother. Keerthi decided to take action.
  • Poongkhulali B.
     
  • The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA) provides remedies for women subjected to physical, emotional, sexual or economic violence. 
  • It organises shelter homes, as well as medical, legal and police aid. 
  • The nodal officer is the Protection Officer, the first point of contact for the victim. 
  • There is at least one Protection Officer in every district. 
  • Keerthi approached one such Protection Officer for help.
  • The officer prepared a Domestic Incident Report and forwarded it to the Local Magistrate with an application seeking interim relief. 
  • She also kept Keerthi and her daughter temporarily in a shelter home. 
  • At the first hearing, the Magistrate found that there was a prima facie case and granted an order that prevented Sridhar from disturbing Keerthi at her workplace and committing further acts of violence. 
  • Other relief sought by the Protection Officer included a monetary order towards the child’s education fees, compensation for the torture and distress, and an order restraining the husband from selling the couple’s house in Preethi’s absence.                                                                             
  • Proceedings under the PWDVA :
  1. are not akin to criminal proceedings. 
  2. Seeking remedy under it is also unlike initiating divorce proceedings. 
  3. The remedies available are civil in nature and 
  4. In the form of protection orders, residence orders the right to reside in the matrimonial home, return of articles, monetary or custody orders, and compensation. 
  5. In case there is a violation of a protection or other interim order, it amounts to an offence leading to imprisonment and fine.
  6. Proceedings can be initiated against any adult male in a domestic relationship with the complainant such as husband, father-in-law, male partners; or female relatives of the husband or male partner such as father, mother, or sister. 
  7. This law recognises relationships that are in the nature of marriage such as live-in relationships.
  8. At the time of submitting an application before the magistrate, it is important to submit all prescribed forms that detail the instances of abuse and seek comprehensive remedies. 
  9. The forms can be obtained from the Protection Officer.
  10. If there is an ongoing proceeding before the magistrate or family or other courts, relief under this law can still be claimed without initiating a fresh proceeding.
  11. Importantly, the law says that the magistrate’s order should be made available immediately and free of cost to the complainant, and the entire proceeding should be completed within 60 days. 

Friday, August 23, 2013

“FLAME”



                                                         “FLAME”
Iran reported substantial damage and huge data lost due to malicious software dubbed as Flame. It could be 3rd most powerful virus after Stuxnet and Duqu viruses. Largest number of infected  machines is in Iran, followed by the Israel/Palestine, then Sudan and Syria.

What is Flame?
Flame is a complex data stealing Virus that contains about 20 times as much  code as Stuxnet about and about 100 times as much code as a typical virus designed to steal financial information.

What is the potential of Flame?
Flame is capable of:

  1. gathering data files
  2. remotely change settings on computers
  3. turn on PC microphones to record conversations
  4. take screen shots
  5. log instant messaging chats

Thus it can steal sophisticated data from computers by exploiting flaws in the Windows O/S.

What are Stuxnet and Duqu?
Stuxnet: A computer worm. Basically spies on and subverts industrial systems. It is notorious for attacking and damaging centrifuges of an Iranian uranium enrichment facility in 2010.
Duqu: Also a computer worm which is often related to the Stuxnet. It was named “Duqu” as it gives prefix "DQ" to the names of files it creates.

To understand the potential of FLAME more, lets see the 5 dimensions of FLAME:-
1. Complexity
2. Breadth
3. Network
4. Victims
5. Perpetrator

Complexity:
  • One of the most complicated pieces of malicious software ever discovered.Nearly 20 times as much code than Stuxnet.
  • Built with some 20 modules which even the researchers can’t fully understand.

Breadth:
  • Most complete data-stealing tools found to date.
  • Can record sounds, access Bluetooth communications, capture regular screenshot images and log Internet Messaging conversations.

Network:
  • A network of over 80 servers across the world used by the FLAME creators to remotely access infected machines.
  • Can change settings on PC
  • Can quietly gather the stolen data
  • Largest such Command and Control network identified to date.

Victims:
  • Most number of infected infected systems found in Iran, followed by Israel and the Palestinian territories.
  • Also found in Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
  • Estimated 1,000-5,000 machines infected worldwide.

Perpetrator:
  • Kaspersky Lab, which claimed credit for uncovering Flame, believes the virus may be the work of the same nation or nations that built the Stuxnet worm that attacked Iran's nuclear program in 2010. But the Kaspersky researchers declined to say which nation or nations they believe are behind Flame.
Why the needle of suspicion points towards the same nation states that build Stuxnet?
  • Actually, the creators of Stuxnet and Flame employed similar techniques to infect computers, which suggests that they were "parallel" projects backed by the same nation state.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS)


Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS)
-Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) was introduced with effect from June1997.
- The focus of the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) is on “poor in all areas” and TPDS involves issue of 10 Kg of food grains per family per month for the population Below Poverty Line (BPL) at specially subsidized prices.

-The TPDS requires the states to
1. Formulate and implement foolproof arrangements for identification of poor,
2. Effective delivery of food grains to Fair Price Shops (FPSs).
3. Its distribution in a transparent and accountable manner at the FPS level.

-The “Targeted” means that the focus is really poor and vulnerable sections of society.
So we can say that Since 1997 the PDS in India has become pro-poor.

But how to identify, who is poor and who is not?
-The identification of the poor under the TPDS is the responsibility of the State
governments. They identified as per the State-wise poverty estimation of the Planning
Commission for 1993-94. These estimates are based upon Lakdawala formula”.

What is Lakdawala formula?
-Poverty estimates of states in India by planning commission are estimated by the
formula developed by late Prof. Lakdawala Committee.
-In Lakdawala formula, the following indices have been used in estimation of the poverty in states:
1. Urban Poverty: CPI-IL (Consumer Price Index for Industrial Laborers)
2. Rural Poverty: CPI- AL (Consumer Price Index for Agricultural Laborers)

How allocation is made to the states?
-Allocation of food grains to the States/UTs was made on the basis of average
consumption in the past. It was average annual off-take of food grains under the PDS
during the past 10 years at the time of introduction of TPDS.

But, since TPDS is pro-poor, what happened to the APL (Above Poverty
Limit) who were purchasing from the FPS?
-The states are allowed in excess of the requirement of the BPL families and the TPDS
allocation. This is called “Transitory Allocation” and it was meant for APL (Above
Poverty Limits).
-The objective of this allocation was that, the sudden withdrawal of the APL families from the TPDS was not desirable. The prices of the Transitory Allocation are higher than the BPL prices.

What is the current allocation to the BPL families under TPDS?
-The earlier allocation was 10 Kg. per month, which was increased this to 20 Kg. per
family per month at 50% of the economic cost in April 2000. This was further increased to 25 kgs in 2001.

-The quantity of food grains available under TPDS has been increased from 25 kg. per month per family to 35 kg. Per month per family with effect from April 2002. This continues till date.

Who fixes the end retail prices?
-The end retail prices or Consumer End Prices (CEP) are fixed by the State Governments or UT administration.
-The government issues the PDS commodities on CIP (Central Issue Price) and the state government fix the Retail price after taking into consideration the margins for wholesalers/retailers, transportations charges, levies, local taxes etc. The states government are requested to not to have a difference of over 50 paise per kg.

Is any rate fixed for Antyodaya Anna Yojna?
-The states cannot interfere with the price issued by the government for AAY in which
the end retail price is to be retained at ` 2/ a Kg. for wheat and ` 3/ a Kg. for rice.

Is TPDS not working in any states?
-TPDS is working in the entire country.

What is the quantity of the allocation under TPDS at centre Level?
-The following table shows the allotment and lifting by the states under the TPDS for
recent years .





Public Distribution System


Public Distribution System

-PDS means distribution of essential commodities to larger section of the society, mostly vulnerable people, through a network of fair Price Shops on a recurring basis.
-The essential commodities under PDS at present are wheat, rice, sugar and Kerosene.
-The first government intervention in the PDS in India started in 1940 during the interwar period.
-Further genesis of PDS occurred during the periods of India-China and India-Pak wars when country face critical shortages of food grains.
-FCI was established in 1964 to handle the shortage of food grains clubbed with black marketing of the food grains by hoarders was a reason for the government to take some action for the containment of rise in food grains prices and ensured access of food to urban consumers. The PDS network expanded in 1970s and 1980s, after the Green Revolution.
-In the 1980s, the PDS coverage was extended to the rural areas. By 1985, efforts were made to make it available to all the tribal blocks of the country.
-Today, with the network of around 5 Lakh fair price shops PDS is virtually world’s largest system of its kind.

-However, PDS was criticized for several reasons. A few of them are as follows:
1. Its bias towards the urban consumers and inability to reach to the last corner of the country.
2. Some states such as Bihar and UP were virtually out of the PDS network.
3. There are no criteria of monitoring the high income group purchases more than low income purchases.
4. The coverage and network of PDS does not ensure that the poorest or the poor is benefited/
5. The PDS has been untargeted and proved to be regressive in some parts of the nations.
6. Consumers get inferior food grains in ration shops. Because, the dealers replace good supplies received from the F.C.I. with inferior stock.
7. Issue of the bogus cards in large numbers which are used to procure the grains from the PDS and sell them in open market.
8. The dealers have little profit so indulge in malpractices.

-In other words, despite of having world’s largest Public Distribution System, there are
people dying in the country out of hunger.

Is PDS only central government’s responsibility?
-No, it is operated under the joint responsibility of the Central and the State Governments.

-The Central government, through FCI has following responsibilities:
1. Procurement, storage, transportation of food grains
2. Bulk allocation of food grains to the State Governments.

-The state government’s responsibility is operational. They are as follows:
1. Identification of families below the poverty line
2. Issue of Ration Cards
3. Supervision of the functioning of FPS.

-The PDS commodities viz. wheat, rice, sugar and kerosene, are allocated to the States/UTs for distribution. Cloth, exercise books, pulses, salt and tea, etc. are distributed by the state governments.

Revamped Public Distribution System (RPDS)
Till 1992, the PDS was untargeted and a general entitlement scheme for all
consumers. Due to criticism & mismanagement allegations, in June 1992, the
Revamped Public Distribution System (RPDS) was launched in 1775 blocks of the
country. However, in 1997, the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) was
introduced with effect from June 1997.